Bobcat 709F vs New Holland C190: Which Is the Better Value?
The Bobcat 709F averages $3,476 CAD at auction, compared to $18,261 for the New Holland C190. That's a $14,785 difference. Based on 22 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Bobcat 709F is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $14,785 less than the C190.
New Holland C190
CTL$18,261 CAD avg
$4,250
Low
$29,046
High
6
Sales
Avg 4,919 hours · 2006–2007 model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between 709F and C190?
- Price: The 709F is $14,785 cheaper on average (81% savings).
- Track Type: 709F is a wheeled skid steer (SSL) while C190 is a compact track loader (CTL). CTLs have better traction on soft ground; wheeled units are faster and cheaper to maintain.
Both Bobcat and New Holland retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a 709F or C190? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: 709F or C190?
Choose the Bobcat 709F if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($14,785 savings)
- You work on pavement, concrete, or hard surfaces
- You prefer Bobcat's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the New Holland C190 if:
- You work on soft ground, mud, or uneven terrain
- You prefer New Holland's dealer network and parts availability
How do 709F and C190 prices compare by year?
| Year | Bobcat 709F | New Holland C190 |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | — | $23,407 (2) |
| 2006 | — | $15,688 (4) |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do 709F and C190 prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Bobcat 709F | New Holland C190 |
|---|---|---|
| 4,000+ hrs | — | $23,407 (2) |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Bobcat 709F
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on New Holland C190
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.